Planing and thought

My plan to actually blog here seems to not have worked very well. As usual, life got crazy busy, and I was put out by a head cold for a bit. Perfectly normal for November. But even though I haven’t been writing, I’ve been thinking a bit. The fourth topic for the ONL course was designing for blended and online learning, and well… It’s an interesting topic, and made me reflect how hard this can be.

I’m not really a natural teacher, but I’ve been teaching to some extent for the last fifteen years. At the beginning, however, it was done without much afterthought in a way I think it’s done more often than not. During this topic, we discussed models for how group learning in a blended environment can be achieved, and how to design for it. I suppose a lot of the discussion focused on the blended aspect, but I still found myself thinking about the group aspect too. Maybe because one of the reading materials that were assigned for this part of the course was the Five stage model of online learning by Gilly Salmon, which definitely puts online learning in a social context. And like one of the other people in my PBL group pointed out, it pretty well described how our group developed.

During my day to day work, I teach information literacy mainly in one shot sessions. This means that I can’t really watch how the collaboration within a group develops, and I can’t really set up groups unless the people are well acquainted beforehand – it takes too much time to get started when all I have is two hours. But much as I’ve learnt that teaching something greatly enhances my understanding of a subject, this course taught me that a good group collaboration can make me understand a topic better, and to view it from more angles. (It helped to have a good group of people willing to try out things and to talk things through, something I haven’t always had in other courses that included group work. The PBL group I worked with for ONL181 was a great group of people to work with – thank you guys!) Also, what I teach is never a students primary concern. How to search for, sort and use information is something they need to solve another problem. This means that I need to be very deliberate in how I plan for facilitating communication and the production of something that students can use not only for finding whatever information they need at the moment, but to be better prepared for future courses. Right now, I’m thinking about how encouraging them to collaborate perhaps could help them build an understanding of some information literacy concepts, rather than just let the session solve their immediate need for some pieces of literature to fulfil the current assignment.

Literacies

A couple of years back, when I started the job I still have, one of the first things that happened was that someone handed me

Mackey, T.P. & Jacobsen, T.E. (2014). Metaliteracy: reinventing information literacy to empower learners. London: Facet Publishing.

and told me I probably was interested. I certainly was, and I believe that was when I first became aware of the multitude of literacies that get discussed a lot. Most likely also the first time I heard about digital literacy. I had spent some time already with the concept of information literacy. Other literacies I’ve been thinking about lately are academic literacy and also data literacy. Somewhere in all those literacies I tend to get lost, feeling that it’s just so many words. But for the last couple of weeks I’ve spent a little time on digital literacy, and I did learn a few interesting things.

Some digital literacy scholars seem to consider information literacy as part of digital literacy. If you come to the subject from the other direction, this seems slightly upside down, since digital literacy, to me, is about how you relate to information no matter if this information is digital or not. However, I suspect this is mostly about where you start. If you want to understand where academic librarians tend to start, the ACRL Framework for information literacy in higher education can be a starting point as good as any. This framework discusses information literacy as it relates to the following points:

  • Authority Is Constructed and Contextual
  • Information Creation as a Process
  • Information Has Value
  • Research as Inquiry
  • Scholarship as Conversation
  • Searching as Strategic Exploration

This blog post, is not mainly about information literacy though. (Or it wasn’t supposed to be.) This should be about digital literacy.

In order to better understand the concept of digital literacy, I tracked down a literature review where they explored three types of definitions of digital literacy.

Spante, M., Sofkova Hashemi, S., Lundin, M., Algers, A., & Wang, S. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, (manuscript just accepted). doi:10.1080/2331186x.2018.1519143

As I understand it, these three types can be considered as building on each other, starting with digital literacy, evolvning into digital literacies and finally becoming critical digital literacies. The definitions used by researchers tended to be based in either policies (just like I did above, by adding a link to the information literacy framework) or to more research based definitions. I found it interesting to see how these evolving definitions seemed to take digital literacy closer to the aspects of information literacy that has always interested me most, That is, how do information seekers actually use the information they find. What do you need in order to find AND USE information in a meaningful way? Perhaps I should understand digital literacy as basically the same, but focusing on using online retrieval and redistribution of information.

I must admit reading about digital literacy has made me a little bit confused. My preconceived ideas would have made it different from information literacy by saying that digital literacy was focused and defined by mode of distribution, whereas information literacy was focused and defined by the goal of integrating new information into one’s knowledge. However, the more I’ve been reading on the subject, the more the lines seem to blur. Also, the choice of term seems to depend a lot on in which discipline the discussion is going on.